Workflow: GitHub PR review

AI agent for GitHub PR review summaries and shipping risk

Use Vost to summarize pull requests, flag risky changes, identify missing tests, and prepare review notes before merge decisions.

Engineering teams searching for PR review automation want faster review cycles without losing control over merges.

Build this workflowView matching agent

What Vost should produce

Findings ordered by severity and grounded in changed files.

Missing tests, migration risk, and rollout concerns.

Clear recommendation: approve, request changes, or investigate.

How to configure it

  1. 1Choose the Engineering Review Agent.
  2. 2Connect GitHub and optionally Linear or Slack.
  3. 3Define repository, branch, or review scope.
  4. 4Keep merge and deployment actions gated.

Approval rules

No merges, pushes, or deployment changes without approval.

Review output leads with risks before summaries.

Unclear behavior is marked as an open question.

Example output

P1: migration can break existing subscriptions.
P2: missing test for expired token path.
Residual risk: webhook replay behavior not covered.

Prompts to use

Review this PR for bugs, data integrity risk, and missing tests.
Every morning, summarize open PRs that need my review.

FAQ

Is Vost a replacement for code review?

No. It is useful as an AI reviewer that prepares risk-focused notes and catches review gaps before a human decides.

Can Vost merge code?

Merge, push, and deployment actions should require explicit approval in the current chat.